![]() |
||
|
Light Light Support Aircraft: L2
VMA
|
||
|
|
«
Previous 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8 9
10 Next » SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Operate with Supported
Troops. The first design requirement considered was that the airplane
be able to operate with the supported troops without the necessity of
any fixed base installation. This would permit integration with the
ground scheme of maneuver and provide the minimum passive defense against
counter air operations in the combat area. Operations from within a
regimental or battalion perimeter would also minimize the security problems
that beset forward tactical airfields, especially where guerilla action
on infiltration tactics are considered. The military definition of STOL
(500' to a 50' obstacle) allows takeoff and landing in moist of the
areas in which limited war might be fought. In addition, the airplane
was designed to use roads so that operation would even be possible in
jungle areas where clearings are few and far between. As a result the
wingspan was limited to twenty feet and a heavy trailing arm type landing
gear with a tread of 6.5ft was provided for operation from roads. Float
operation is feasible.
3.
Ordnance.a. General. It is not considered necessary or desirable to carry an extremely heavy ordnance load. Accuracy, proper tactics and weapons matched to targets will provide effective firepower as distinguished from blind, destructive force. Provision is made for a capability against relatively soft, fleeting targets like troops and unarmored vehicles; for hard point targets like tanks; and for larger targets like bridges and bunkers. The aircraft will be able to carry sufficient ordnance to execute an interdiction type strike effectively and still provide a good armed reconnaissance capability on the same sortie. b. Guns. The most effective all around
weapon will be the four 7.6mm machine guns (or similar type weapons)
which are effective against troops, unarmored vehicles and helicopters.
Strafing is not limited by safe separation requirements and targets
can be hit with precision without risking damage to nearby personnel
or property. There would be no particular problem in mounting 20 mm
guns, if necessary. However, unless developments like the German anti-tank
20 mm prove effective, the heavier guns would probably not be desirable. d. Miscellaneous Targets. For bunkers, roads and rail cuts and bridges, low level attack with delay fuse bombs seems to be the best approach. Napalm, a number of small bombs or possibly mortar shells or their equivalent could also be carried, if the situation so warranted. e. Sample Loads. While further evaluation of specific weapons is required, the aircraft will be able to carry a sufficient quantity of aviation or modified infantry type ordnance to provide an extremely flexible capability. The following loads would be feasible and give an indication of the possibilities of the aircraft: (1) In a dispersed situation, operating with the infantry, where logistics are critical and aviation type ordnance is not available.
(2) From a short forward airfield with aviation ordnance:
«
Previous 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8 9
10 Next »
|