|









|
|
«
Previous 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
SUMMARY
1. General. The tactics and aircraft
design which resulted from this study embody many innovations and further
development and testing will be required to perfect detailed aircraft
specifications and tactical doctrine. The use of light aircraft does
show considerable promise, however, and the major aspects of the concept
can be evaluated by an application of the checks of suitability, feasibility
and acceptability.
2. Suitability. Light aircraft are the only means of providing
a good target acquisition, armed reconnaissance and discrimination capability.
The capability of dealing with helicopter and mechanized forces and
to provide adequate integrated air support has not been physically demonstrated.
Suitability in these areas may be questioned on the basis of firepower
or ordnance load. It would seem, however, that loads comparable in tonnage
to those carried by WWII fighter bombers would be adequate, especially,
if the ordnance and tactics were matched to the target. The ability
to serve as an airborne controller for high performance aircraft and
to make numerous relatively short range sorties should compensate for
lack of tonnage on any one sortie. While further tests are required
to determine optimum weapons, the required tasks can be accomplished
by light aircraft and the concept generally meets the test of suitability.
3. Feasibility. A light aircraft with the general characteristics
required is definitely feasible. Some innovations such as the ability
to operate from roads or use infantry ordnance are not proved, but these
affect the concept only to a limited degree. An engineering feasibility
study involving all major aspects of design has been completed and checked
by prominent aeronautical design engineers.
4. Acceptability. Is it worth what it costs in dollars, lives
and logistics? Dollar cost is negligible compared with other aircraft
and since no tactical type aircraft would be replaced by implementation
of this concept, no existing military capabilities will be lost. Vulnerability
is a question which can be resolved completely only in combat and must
be considered in relation to mission and the tactical situation. The
relative immunity of this type aircraft to attack on its base is a great
advantage and passive defense measures and tactics enable it to evade
much of the opposition. It seems to be a fairly safe assumption that
close support operations at least can be conducted without the prohibitive
losses and that vulnerability will be considerably less than that of
helicopters. This type plane will not be absolutely safe, invulnerable
or invincible, but then neither is the rifleman who needs its support.
Logistically, light aircraft offer overall advantages, especially where
rapid reaction to limited war situations are required. The only time
that logistic acceptability is a consideration is in a dispersed situation
where the aircraft are operated with the infantry. The commander concerned
will have to decide whether the airplane will be more effective per
unit of logistic support that other weapons such as artillery. The small
amount of extra fuel required by light aircraft should be offset in
most cases by greater ease in transportation to the combat area and
greater flexibility. At least the commander should be provided the opportunity
to choose.
5. Conclusion. The weakness of current aviation capabilities
in terms of limited war must be faced and eliminated. As far as can
be determined without actual operational testing, the use of light aircraft
is suitable, feasible and acceptable. This light support concept must
be considered in relation to the possibility of achieving needed capabilities
that are not available now and may not be available through any other
means.
«
Previous 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10


|